Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22921 - 22930 of 29942 for des.
Search results 22921 - 22930 of 29942 for des.
Richard P. Selerski v. Village of West Milwaukee
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10668 - 2005-03-31
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10668 - 2005-03-31
State v. William T. Ackerman
establish reasonable suspicion or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
establish reasonable suspicion or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. DeLain
ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DeLain has not contested any material findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6469 - 2017-09-19
ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DeLain has not contested any material findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6469 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
WI 66, ¶17, 291 Wis. 2d at 188, 717 N.W.2d at 5 (citation omitted). On appeal, our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100494 - 2013-08-04
WI 66, ¶17, 291 Wis. 2d at 188, 717 N.W.2d at 5 (citation omitted). On appeal, our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100494 - 2013-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1978). Whether the State has violated the discovery statute presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102446 - 2017-09-21
(1978). Whether the State has violated the discovery statute presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102446 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marvin L. Hereford
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. A motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13971 - 2014-09-15
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. A motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13971 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672751 - 2023-06-27
to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672751 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185329 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s conduct was deficient or prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 634. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161065 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s conduct was deficient or prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 634. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161065 - 2017-09-21