Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22921 - 22930 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF] NOTICE
would have affected his decision to plead guilty.” Id., ¶11. This court also noted that “the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39849 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21

State v. David Kons
informants. The controlled buys were contemporaneously monitored and recorded on audio tapes by virtue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8127 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
denied his postconviction motion, ruling that the record belied Maddox’s claims that his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31308 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
addict, and was known to be armed with a shotgun or rifle. ¶5 Detectives searched MPD records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316919 - 2020-12-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
deference to the determination of the trier of fact. We must examine the record to find facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215691 - 2018-07-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in Racine County.” He argues that “there is no evidence in the record that The Daily Reporter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169343 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Major C. Latimer
record. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The two complaining witnesses returned home one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15782 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
will first recite the facts as found by the small claims court and backed by the record. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33690 - 2008-08-12

[PDF] State v. Jonathan V. Manke
the court based the determination upon facts in the record and relied on the appropriate law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14452 - 2017-09-21