Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22921 - 22930 of 73365 for ha.
Search results 22921 - 22930 of 73365 for ha.
[PDF]
State v. Mark Cianciolo
factor has been defined as “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8114 - 2017-09-19
factor has been defined as “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8114 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Koua v.
of the child is the "paramount consideration" in all juvenile court proceedings, [t]he ... court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9569 - 2017-09-19
of the child is the "paramount consideration" in all juvenile court proceedings, [t]he ... court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9569 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). ¶8 We do not disagree with the circuit court’s conclusion that Hill has not raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175054 - 2017-09-21
omitted). ¶8 We do not disagree with the circuit court’s conclusion that Hill has not raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175054 - 2017-09-21
State v. Koua v.
is the "paramount consideration" in all juvenile court proceedings, [t]he ... court has discretion as to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9569 - 2005-03-31
is the "paramount consideration" in all juvenile court proceedings, [t]he ... court has discretion as to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9569 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas A. Logemann
no objection from Logemann, and he has not argued that the method used was unreasonable. ¶10 The second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2912 - 2017-09-19
no objection from Logemann, and he has not argued that the method used was unreasonable. ¶10 The second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2912 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dale K. Blanck
, he has failed to preserve a meaningful record for appellate review and we affirm his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6342 - 2005-03-31
, he has failed to preserve a meaningful record for appellate review and we affirm his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6342 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rick A. Walz
. Anytime Mr. Walz, if I believe that he’s been drinking or have evidence that he’s drinking or has contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25623 - 2006-06-21
. Anytime Mr. Walz, if I believe that he’s been drinking or have evidence that he’s drinking or has contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25623 - 2006-06-21
[PDF]
State v. Dale Becker
and reasonable No. 03-1068-CR 4 inferences from those facts, that an individual is violating or has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6403 - 2017-09-19
and reasonable No. 03-1068-CR 4 inferences from those facts, that an individual is violating or has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6403 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas B.
weapon, two straight-edged razor blades. Because we are bound by precedent which has already held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12458 - 2017-09-21
weapon, two straight-edged razor blades. Because we are bound by precedent which has already held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12458 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant has established the existence of a new factor, the trial court must determine whether that “‘new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50285 - 2010-05-24
the defendant has established the existence of a new factor, the trial court must determine whether that “‘new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50285 - 2010-05-24