Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22921 - 22930 of 49916 for our.
Search results 22921 - 22930 of 49916 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a judgment of divorce from respondent Julie Fleming. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736880 - 2023-12-07
a judgment of divorce from respondent Julie Fleming. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736880 - 2023-12-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
agree with counsel that a challenge to Waterman’s sentence would lack arguable merit. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91040 - 2014-09-15
agree with counsel that a challenge to Waterman’s sentence would lack arguable merit. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91040 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
person appropriate for commitment under ch. 980. See WIS. STAT. § 980.05. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181974 - 2017-09-21
person appropriate for commitment under ch. 980. See WIS. STAT. § 980.05. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181974 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph McGowan
to sentence credit for this time period. Our own review of the record is inconclusive on this topic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5666 - 2005-03-31
to sentence credit for this time period. Our own review of the record is inconclusive on this topic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5666 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denied his motion for reconsideration of our May 5, 1994 dismissal. ¶3 In the instant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31003 - 2007-11-28
denied his motion for reconsideration of our May 5, 1994 dismissal. ¶3 In the instant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31003 - 2007-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). No. 2013AP528-CRNM 3 Our review of the record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101708 - 2017-09-21
. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). No. 2013AP528-CRNM 3 Our review of the record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101708 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
.[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134109 - 2015-01-28
.[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134109 - 2015-01-28
CA Blank Order
supervision in the misdemeanor setting. There would be no arguable merit to a challenge to the sentence. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121730 - 2014-09-16
supervision in the misdemeanor setting. There would be no arguable merit to a challenge to the sentence. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121730 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
erred in denying her motion for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017155 - 2025-10-01
erred in denying her motion for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017155 - 2025-10-01
CA Blank Order
Cane, Reserve Judge. Jack Minniecheske, pro se, appeals a 1997 judgment of conviction. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91937 - 2013-01-22
Cane, Reserve Judge. Jack Minniecheske, pro se, appeals a 1997 judgment of conviction. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91937 - 2013-01-22