Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 30245 for de.

COURT OF APPEALS
Bennett negligent as a matter of law. We review directed verdicts de novo. Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35265 - 2009-01-20

[PDF] Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA Associates
Whether the essential terms of a contract are definite presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6653 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 221 Wis. 2d 1, 6, 584 N.W.2d 695 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34789 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Reginald Green
in Wisconsin requiring this court to construe § 943.28, STATS. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10482 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] C.L. and T.W. (minor) v. The School District of Menomonee Falls
. See § 802.08, STATS. Our review is de novo. See M&I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Mgmt., Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11938 - 2017-09-21

MR v. Jason Turcott
review an order for summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court. Waters v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7216 - 2005-03-31

Century 21 - Olympia, Inc. v. Jeffrey J. Chayer
Century 21 is entitled to fees de novo. Id. ¶9 To the extent a party is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4052 - 2005-03-31

Brian E. Davis v. Nationsbank, N.A.
, we will affirm the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment. See id. Our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2388 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See Love, 284 Wis. 2d 111, ¶26. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113805 - 2017-09-21

Spic and Span, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee
. Our review is de novo. See Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9165 - 2005-03-31