Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 29713 for des.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 29713 for des.
State v. Andrew J. K.
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13
State v. Gerald A. Edson
of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions. State v. Bergeron, 162 Wis.2d 521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions. State v. Bergeron, 162 Wis.2d 521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI APP 28
with a nonparty witness who has yet to testify. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60384 - 2011-03-29
with a nonparty witness who has yet to testify. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60384 - 2011-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
procedures.[5] See Hoppe, 317 Wis. 2d 161, ¶17 (We consider de novo the sufficiency of the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115241 - 2014-06-23
procedures.[5] See Hoppe, 317 Wis. 2d 161, ¶17 (We consider de novo the sufficiency of the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115241 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
are barred by Escalona-Naranjo in any particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-29
are barred by Escalona-Naranjo in any particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. This presents a question of law we review de novo. World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky, 2002 WI 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27406 - 2006-12-11
. This presents a question of law we review de novo. World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky, 2002 WI 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27406 - 2006-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
statutory construction, “‘they present questions of law, which we review de novo.’” See Harbor Credit Union
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
statutory construction, “‘they present questions of law, which we review de novo.’” See Harbor Credit Union
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
Lawyer Regulation System of the State of Wisconsin v. David C. Williams
, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16701 - 2005-03-31
, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16701 - 2005-03-31
Jerome J. Miezin v. Midwest Express Airlines, Inc.
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18147 - 2005-07-06
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18147 - 2005-07-06