Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 33896 for dismissed.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 33896 for dismissed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and the disorderly conduct charge was dismissed and read-in. At sentencing, SM described how Bennett had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463895 - 2021-12-22
, and the disorderly conduct charge was dismissed and read-in. At sentencing, SM described how Bennett had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463895 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entered a guilty plea to one count and the remaining counts were dismissed and read in for sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205831 - 2017-12-19
entered a guilty plea to one count and the remaining counts were dismissed and read in for sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205831 - 2017-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissed and read in. The court sentenced her to seven years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156164 - 2017-09-21
dismissed and read in. The court sentenced her to seven years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156164 - 2017-09-21
City of Waukesha v. Steven Reidy
holding. Reidy’s Krier interpretation can easily be dismissed. There, we held, “[W]hen a person’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14265 - 2005-03-31
holding. Reidy’s Krier interpretation can easily be dismissed. There, we held, “[W]hen a person’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14265 - 2005-03-31
Kari K. Stuckel v. Mildred K. Olsen
to undue influence, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment of dismissal. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7138 - 2005-03-31
to undue influence, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment of dismissal. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismiss the case on the ground that destruction of the videotape violated his constitutional right to due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2005-04-02
and dismiss the case on the ground that destruction of the videotape violated his constitutional right to due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2005-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
with the State by which four of the burglary charges were dismissed in exchange for her guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35943 - 2006-02-06
with the State by which four of the burglary charges were dismissed in exchange for her guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35943 - 2006-02-06
State v. Barry L. Ball
of disorderly conduct instead. The trial court eventually dismissed one of the charges. [3] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2795 - 2005-03-31
of disorderly conduct instead. The trial court eventually dismissed one of the charges. [3] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2795 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. In exchange for Guthrie-Bey’s plea, the State agreed to dismiss and read-in two other charges. The plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133789 - 2012-08-28
. In exchange for Guthrie-Bey’s plea, the State agreed to dismiss and read-in two other charges. The plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133789 - 2012-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arrears) that he failed to pay and that “[t]he circuit court is in error for dismissing the Petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10
arrears) that he failed to pay and that “[t]he circuit court is in error for dismissing the Petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10