Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 44385 for name change.

Daniel S. Stasiewicz v. Juan Pagan, Jr.
in December 1999. ¶13 At this point, Attorney Surma changed his strategy and basis for precluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3882 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carl R. Kramer
to the Dog House Saloon, prompted a change in the Fond du Lac county prosecution policy that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert M. Madden
whether the current law should be changed to require the trial court to advise a defendant when it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15786 - 2005-03-31

Michael H. v. Jeffrey G. N.
and Cade. They point to testimony that they would not have agreed to change guardianship of Madeline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6332 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
Smith, 122 Wis. 2d at 437-38. Nonetheless, the legislature did not change the waiver rule exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34114 - 2014-09-15

M. Susan Churchill v. WFA Econometrics Corporation
have changed the punitive damage award to zero; (4) whether the verdict was defective; (5) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4916 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and the presentence investigation report. Neither Staten nor the State requested changes or corrections to the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28688 - 2007-04-16

[PDF] Town of Cable Sanitary District No. 1 v. Telemark Interval Owners Association, Inc.
of the new description, writing it believed “with the Sanitation District’s changing of the description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6567 - 2017-09-19

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
surreptitiously videotaped and recorded, Birdsall encouraged D.A. to change or recant her statements to the police
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31

William E. Johnson v. Donna M. Johnson
a substantial change in circumstances after the divorce warranting a modification of maintenance.” Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14312 - 2005-03-31