Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Clerk of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
and coordinates remittitur of the case record, as appropriate. ATTORNEY ADMISSIONS The Clerk’s Office
/courts/resources/docs/sccaclerk.pdf - 2026-03-03
and coordinates remittitur of the case record, as appropriate. ATTORNEY ADMISSIONS The Clerk’s Office
/courts/resources/docs/sccaclerk.pdf - 2026-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-15
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kurt W. Meyer
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2967 - 2005-03-31
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2967 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ladarwin D. Copeland
with decision-making”; rather, it “depend[s] on facts that are of record or that are reasonably derived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25908 - 2006-08-29
with decision-making”; rather, it “depend[s] on facts that are of record or that are reasonably derived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25908 - 2006-08-29
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145256 - 2015-07-27
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145256 - 2015-07-27
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109922 - 2014-04-08
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109922 - 2014-04-08
State v. Jerome M. Nelligan
. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12696 - 2005-03-31
. Nelligan claims this finding was clearly erroneous. Because the record supports the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12696 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, and the supplemental no-merit report, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94892 - 2013-03-31
, and the supplemental no-merit report, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94892 - 2013-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Toni P. Cayton
aimed at the correction of “an error of fact not appearing on the record.” Jessen, 95 Wis. 2d at 213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3867 - 2017-09-20
aimed at the correction of “an error of fact not appearing on the record.” Jessen, 95 Wis. 2d at 213
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3867 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378212 - 2021-06-17
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378212 - 2021-06-17