Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 83825 for simple case search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 83825 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial that resulted in the judgment, Jackson’s case was subject to a municipal court proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649424 - 2023-04-27
trial that resulted in the judgment, Jackson’s case was subject to a municipal court proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649424 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
28, 2019, Gladney filed the initial complaint in this case, seeking $10,000 for property damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
28, 2019, Gladney filed the initial complaint in this case, seeking $10,000 for property damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference No. 2020AP1107 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
and record, we conclude at conference No. 2020AP1107 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
because the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124790 - 2014-10-21
because the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124790 - 2014-10-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. of Workforce Dev. v. LIRC, 2016 WI App 21, ¶7, 367 Wis. 2d 609, 877 N.W.2d 620. This case also involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
. of Workforce Dev. v. LIRC, 2016 WI App 21, ¶7, 367 Wis. 2d 609, 877 N.W.2d 620. This case also involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2021
1 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES MARCH 2021 NOTICE: Due
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343380 - 2021-03-03
1 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES MARCH 2021 NOTICE: Due
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343380 - 2021-03-03