Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 22931 - 22940 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5113 - 2005-03-31
judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to kill his wife. The matter proceeded to trial, where the sole issue was intent. The jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480024 - 2022-02-08
to kill his wife. The matter proceeded to trial, where the sole issue was intent. The jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480024 - 2022-02-08
CA Blank Order
is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to honor his substitution request. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103978 - 2013-11-04
is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to honor his substitution request. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103978 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
Stephen W. Jones v. Eleanor Swoboda
to his open records requests. The only No. 95-2540 -2- relief the trial court provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9673 - 2017-09-19
to his open records requests. The only No. 95-2540 -2- relief the trial court provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9673 - 2017-09-19
Carl I. Nelson, Jr. v. Charlotte A. Nelson
it did not. We affirm. ¶2 The trial court divided the property 80/20 in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2586 - 2005-03-31
it did not. We affirm. ¶2 The trial court divided the property 80/20 in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional rights; (3) the prosecutor presented evidence at trial that had no relevance to this case; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105004 - 2017-09-21
constitutional rights; (3) the prosecutor presented evidence at trial that had no relevance to this case; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105004 - 2017-09-21
Marian Steffens v. Vernon Steffens
.” In August 1983, Vernon moved the trial court to reduce his support obligation because two of the three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13206 - 2005-03-31
.” In August 1983, Vernon moved the trial court to reduce his support obligation because two of the three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13206 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank S. Smith
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
and orders denying their motions for postconviction relief. The issues are whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10535 - 2017-09-20
and orders denying their motions for postconviction relief. The issues are whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10535 - 2017-09-20
Mike Hanna v. Thomas A. Braun
,” followed by several pages of allegations stating, among other things: that the trial judge made a false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14289 - 2005-03-31
,” followed by several pages of allegations stating, among other things: that the trial judge made a false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14289 - 2005-03-31