Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22941 - 22950 of 29942 for des.
Search results 22941 - 22950 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. No. 2025AP2382 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083192 - 2026-02-27
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. No. 2025AP2382 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083192 - 2026-02-27
State v. Frank Miles
of a statute presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the County satisfied its burden de novo. Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. ¶23 This is, in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913011 - 2025-02-13
the County satisfied its burden de novo. Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. ¶23 This is, in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913011 - 2025-02-13
State v. Edward Garrett
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3307 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3307 - 2005-03-31
Doris H. Krohn v. Jerome Krohn
if the reasoning is not expressly stated. See Schauer v. De Neveu Homeowners Ass'n Inc., 194 Wis.2d 62, 71, 533
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
if the reasoning is not expressly stated. See Schauer v. De Neveu Homeowners Ass'n Inc., 194 Wis.2d 62, 71, 533
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
Steven H. Roehl v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
review of a summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13942 - 2005-03-31
review of a summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13942 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 26
. § 88.87(2)(c). Interpretation and application of a statute are matters of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257385 - 2020-06-15
. § 88.87(2)(c). Interpretation and application of a statute are matters of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257385 - 2020-06-15
State v. Andrew J. K.
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
Walter G. Bohrer, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. Wis. Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3266 - 2017-09-19
facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. Wis. Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3266 - 2017-09-19