Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22941 - 22950 of 29942 for des.
Search results 22941 - 22950 of 29942 for des.
State v. William T. Ackerman
establish reasonable suspicion or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
establish reasonable suspicion or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. DeLain
ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DeLain has not contested any material findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6469 - 2017-09-19
ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DeLain has not contested any material findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6469 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
those findings are clearly erroneous. See id., ¶13. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246382 - 2019-09-10
those findings are clearly erroneous. See id., ¶13. However, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246382 - 2019-09-10
CA Blank Order
WI 66, ¶17, 291 Wis. 2d at 188, 717 N.W.2d at 5 (citation omitted). On appeal, our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100494 - 2013-08-04
WI 66, ¶17, 291 Wis. 2d at 188, 717 N.W.2d at 5 (citation omitted). On appeal, our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100494 - 2013-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1978). Whether the State has violated the discovery statute presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102446 - 2017-09-21
(1978). Whether the State has violated the discovery statute presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102446 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Stan. L. Rev. 711, 717 (2017). ¶28 Our review of the trial court’s denial of Hall’s motion is not de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237654 - 2019-03-19
Stan. L. Rev. 711, 717 (2017). ¶28 Our review of the trial court’s denial of Hall’s motion is not de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237654 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
State v. Marvin L. Hereford
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. A motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13971 - 2014-09-15
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. A motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13971 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672751 - 2023-06-27
to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=672751 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185329 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185329 - 2017-09-21