Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22941 - 22950 of 68728 for did.
Search results 22941 - 22950 of 68728 for did.
Ray A. Peterson v. Department of Industry
, and the United States Supreme Court. The court reasoned that it did not have the authority to award attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14902 - 2005-03-31
, and the United States Supreme Court. The court reasoned that it did not have the authority to award attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed their counterclaims. The court did not permit Her to amend his pleadings to include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922495 - 2025-03-04
and dismissed their counterclaims. The court did not permit Her to amend his pleadings to include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922495 - 2025-03-04
State v. Roger L. Warren
and three of the information are identical in law, they are different in fact; and (2) the legislature did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
and three of the information are identical in law, they are different in fact; and (2) the legislature did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
that Deutsches Land did not meet its burden of proof to establish that it is entitled No. 2004AP2613 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19038 - 2017-09-21
that Deutsches Land did not meet its burden of proof to establish that it is entitled No. 2004AP2613 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19038 - 2017-09-21
Micheal Locklear v. David H. Schwarz
, the circuit court denied Locklear’s petition because he did not provide documentary proof of exhaustion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16290 - 2005-03-31
, the circuit court denied Locklear’s petition because he did not provide documentary proof of exhaustion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16290 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the apartment to protect her kids from the fight. Zrenner did not say anything to her during the call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85592 - 2012-07-30
to the apartment to protect her kids from the fight. Zrenner did not say anything to her during the call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85592 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
State v. James A. Montgomery
of the alleged prior convictions, leads this court to conclude that Montgomery did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12979 - 2017-09-21
of the alleged prior convictions, leads this court to conclude that Montgomery did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mother, sister and brother. Kroubetz did not testify. No. 2015AP449-CR 4 ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182131 - 2017-09-21
mother, sister and brother. Kroubetz did not testify. No. 2015AP449-CR 4 ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182131 - 2017-09-21
Mary L. O. v. Tommy R. B., Jr.
to a substantially lower income. The family court stated: [I]f we have, as the evidence clearly did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16868 - 2005-03-31
to a substantially lower income. The family court stated: [I]f we have, as the evidence clearly did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16868 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this have an effect on the values of nearby properties, and that the business did not “fit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39284 - 2009-08-10
this have an effect on the values of nearby properties, and that the business did not “fit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39284 - 2009-08-10