Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22961 - 22970 of 62661 for child support.

[PDF] Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
The testimony of many of Johnson’s co-workers supported the determination that the tree-cutting crew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3337 - 2017-09-19

Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
supported the determination that the tree-cutting crew was not adequately trained. The administrative law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3337 - 2005-03-31

Rogelio Delgado, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee Employees' Retirement System/Annuity and Pension Board
because there was no “substantial evidence” to support the decision and because he continues to suffer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6294 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
supports that Brown was never charged or convicted.2 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868545 - 2024-10-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was not supported by substantial evidence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678665 - 2023-07-19

[PDF] Rogelio Delgado, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee Employees' Retirement System/Annuity and Pension Board
in eliminating his benefits because there was no “substantial evidence” to support the No. 03-0758 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6294 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not supported by the evidence. We disagree, and for the following reasons, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016593 - 2025-09-30

[PDF] Country Kitchen Restaurant v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
to support the finding of an occupational disease instead of an accidental injury and that LIRC incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13183 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous credibility determinations. Essentially, from the arguments presented in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48942 - 2010-04-13

[PDF] NOTICE
. Essentially, from the arguments presented in support of these appellate issues, we read Patel to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48942 - 2014-09-15