Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22961 - 22970 of 73951 for public records.
Search results 22961 - 22970 of 73951 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
options, Van Patten agreed to enter the plea. We have reviewed the record with due deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19
options, Van Patten agreed to enter the plea. We have reviewed the record with due deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appropriate in the past, and continued the schedule with dates into the future. The record supports Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
appropriate in the past, and continued the schedule with dates into the future. The record supports Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
of the board, rather than the circuit court, and our review is limited to the record created before the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19
of the board, rather than the circuit court, and our review is limited to the record created before the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to protect the public, and the circuit court may also take into account a wide variety of additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102636 - 2017-09-21
to protect the public, and the circuit court may also take into account a wide variety of additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102636 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
the Records and the no-merit report, we conclude there are no issues of arguable merit that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109481 - 2014-03-19
the Records and the no-merit report, we conclude there are no issues of arguable merit that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109481 - 2014-03-19
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
the consequences of failing to timely hold his revocation hearing. More importantly, the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
the consequences of failing to timely hold his revocation hearing. More importantly, the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record was there mention of any harassment in November 2004. ¶5 It is not clear whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31761 - 2008-02-06
in the record was there mention of any harassment in November 2004. ¶5 It is not clear whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31761 - 2008-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Colleen Lemmer
that the appellate record does not include the actual transcript. However, Lemmer’s reply brief does not complain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16046 - 2017-09-21
that the appellate record does not include the actual transcript. However, Lemmer’s reply brief does not complain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16046 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the past, and continued the schedule with dates into the future. The record supports Judge Lamelas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76403 - 2012-01-17
in the past, and continued the schedule with dates into the future. The record supports Judge Lamelas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76403 - 2012-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
or unjustifiable basis for the sentence in the record.” State v. Wickstrom, 118 Wis. 2d 339, 354, 348 N.W.2d 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79225 - 2012-03-07
or unjustifiable basis for the sentence in the record.” State v. Wickstrom, 118 Wis. 2d 339, 354, 348 N.W.2d 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79225 - 2012-03-07