Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22961 - 22970 of 46790 for shows.
Search results 22961 - 22970 of 46790 for shows.
CA Blank Order
was not bound by the attorneys’ sentence recommendations. The record shows Jump’s plea was knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12
was not bound by the attorneys’ sentence recommendations. The record shows Jump’s plea was knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the nature of the charges, the rights Lengling was waiving, and other matters. The record shows no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501424 - 2022-03-31
to the nature of the charges, the rights Lengling was waiving, and other matters. The record shows no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501424 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
if the complainant can show the defendant was not prejudiced, and, where the defect is fundamental, no personal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100648 - 2017-09-21
if the complainant can show the defendant was not prejudiced, and, where the defect is fundamental, no personal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100648 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie J. Webster
$5375.79. If the costs are not paid by that date, and absent a showing to this court of his inability
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17375 - 2017-09-21
$5375.79. If the costs are not paid by that date, and absent a showing to this court of his inability
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lori A. Stone
argues that the testimony was insufficient to establish probable cause because it did not show any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26012 - 2017-09-21
argues that the testimony was insufficient to establish probable cause because it did not show any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26012 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Ahlers
but to reverse the order. The State does not dispute that it had the burden at the refusal hearing to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9986 - 2017-09-19
but to reverse the order. The State does not dispute that it had the burden at the refusal hearing to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9986 - 2017-09-19
State v. David E. Verhagen
the burden of proof to both parties, requiring the State to make a prima facie showing for retention
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8206 - 2013-09-17
the burden of proof to both parties, requiring the State to make a prima facie showing for retention
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8206 - 2013-09-17
State v. Timothy J. Ahlers
at the refusal hearing to show that at the time the arresting officer requested Ahlers to consent to a chemical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9986 - 2005-03-31
at the refusal hearing to show that at the time the arresting officer requested Ahlers to consent to a chemical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9986 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 227.53(1)(a)1.-2. The undisputed evidence in the record shows that Lee properly served the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87088 - 2012-09-17
§ 227.53(1)(a)1.-2. The undisputed evidence in the record shows that Lee properly served the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87088 - 2012-09-17
Kim R. Smith v. Barbara J. Eastridge
offered was material and would have changed the result, he did not show that it came to his notice after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15429 - 2005-03-31
offered was material and would have changed the result, he did not show that it came to his notice after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15429 - 2005-03-31