Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22971 - 22980 of 29942 for des.
Search results 22971 - 22980 of 29942 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation and application of the statute to undisputed facts are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86090 - 2012-08-14
interpretation and application of the statute to undisputed facts are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86090 - 2012-08-14
[PDF]
Lake City Corporation v. City of Mequon
of statutory construction which is a question of law that we review de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8354 - 2017-09-19
of statutory construction which is a question of law that we review de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8354 - 2017-09-19
State v. Darius K. Jennings
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. ¶29 Here, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14828 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. ¶29 Here, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14828 - 2005-03-31
wi app 131 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP183 Complete Title of...
that are material to this appeal, and we review de novo whether the settlement agreement may be enforced. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88252 - 2012-11-28
that are material to this appeal, and we review de novo whether the settlement agreement may be enforced. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88252 - 2012-11-28
State v. Jerrell I. Denson
. We review that conclusion de novo. See State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15720 - 2005-03-31
. We review that conclusion de novo. See State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15720 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing. Id. We review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
without a hearing. Id. We review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 25, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the issue is whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standard, our review is de novo. Gallagher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27915 - 2007-01-24
the issue is whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standard, our review is de novo. Gallagher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27915 - 2007-01-24
Sandra K. Ward v. Dennis Jahnke
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Waage, 188 Wis.2d at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12791 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Waage, 188 Wis.2d at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12791 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas D. Myers
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. When we address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10115 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. When we address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10115 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16