Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22971 - 22980 of 63980 for records/1000.
Search results 22971 - 22980 of 63980 for records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of his balance. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95160 - 2014-09-15
of his balance. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95160 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945983 - 2025-04-24
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945983 - 2025-04-24
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Based upon an independent review of the report and record, this court concludes that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110999 - 2014-04-29
not to do so. Based upon an independent review of the report and record, this court concludes that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110999 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158171 - 2017-09-21
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158171 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William J. Dresen, Jr.
consecutive sentences were the only sentencing option. Our review of the record indicates that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10285 - 2017-09-20
consecutive sentences were the only sentencing option. Our review of the record indicates that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10285 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, but did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496989 - 2022-03-22
, was advised of his right to file a response, but did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496989 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-15
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jill L. Schwenkhoff v. Ronald O. Schwenkhoff
exercised its discretion in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7915 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7915 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239623 - 2019-04-23
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239623 - 2019-04-23