Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22981 - 22990 of 29942 for des.
Search results 22981 - 22990 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶21 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.9795(12) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964656 - 2025-06-03
standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶21 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.9795(12) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964656 - 2025-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Kohn, 283 Wis. 2d 1, ¶12. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140730 - 2015-04-27
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Kohn, 283 Wis. 2d 1, ¶12. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140730 - 2015-04-27
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
legal standard to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
legal standard to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
Janice M. Dunn v. Milwaukee County
perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method employed by circuit courts. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7193 - 2005-03-31
perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method employed by circuit courts. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7193 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
2007 WI APP 17
, we generally review issues of statutory construction de novo. Coutts, 209 Wis. 2d at 663. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27364 - 2007-01-30
, we generally review issues of statutory construction de novo. Coutts, 209 Wis. 2d at 663. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27364 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Roy J. Jones
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13720 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13720 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245087 - 2019-08-09
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245087 - 2019-08-09