Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 231 - 240 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 231 - 240 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the State agreed to dismiss the two other counts and refer the case to the Deferred Prosecution Program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953406 - 2025-05-08
and the State agreed to dismiss the two other counts and refer the case to the Deferred Prosecution Program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953406 - 2025-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
thing to revive a prosecution already dead, and another to give it a longer lease of life." Falter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16508 - 2017-09-21
thing to revive a prosecution already dead, and another to give it a longer lease of life." Falter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16508 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective by failing to request a deferred prosecution agreement during plea negotiations. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92889 - 2013-02-13
was ineffective by failing to request a deferred prosecution agreement during plea negotiations. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92889 - 2013-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by failing to request a deferred prosecution agreement during plea negotiations. For the reasons explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
by failing to request a deferred prosecution agreement during plea negotiations. For the reasons explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David H. Hubbard
$1,000, constitutes but one felony. We conclude, however, that the allowable unit of prosecution under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10600 - 2017-09-20
$1,000, constitutes but one felony. We conclude, however, that the allowable unit of prosecution under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10600 - 2017-09-20
State v. David H. Hubbard
, however, that the allowable unit of prosecution under § 943.24(2) is a group of checks having a total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10600 - 2005-03-31
, however, that the allowable unit of prosecution under § 943.24(2) is a group of checks having a total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randall A. Tetzner
none. In fact, the surviving evidence suggests otherwise. The prosecution kept the bullet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13498 - 2017-09-21
none. In fact, the surviving evidence suggests otherwise. The prosecution kept the bullet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13498 - 2017-09-21
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
that Schultz contends is relevant to a claim of selective prosecution. Alternatively, Schultz argues the fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
that Schultz contends is relevant to a claim of selective prosecution. Alternatively, Schultz argues the fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
in the neighborhood—evidence that Schultz contends is relevant to a claim of selective prosecution. Alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
in the neighborhood—evidence that Schultz contends is relevant to a claim of selective prosecution. Alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Employment Act; (3) that the circuit court should not have dismissed her claim for malicious prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
Employment Act; (3) that the circuit court should not have dismissed her claim for malicious prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15