Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 231 - 240 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 231 - 240 of 58340 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
to a speedy trial was violated, whether the State violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29966 - 2007-08-13
to a speedy trial was violated, whether the State violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29966 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Anderson also asserts that his first trial attorney was ineffective by not filing a speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461589 - 2021-12-09
. Anderson also asserts that his first trial attorney was ineffective by not filing a speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461589 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
Review-Memo
examines whether Luis A. Ramirez’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated under the framework
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909624 - 2025-01-30
examines whether Luis A. Ramirez’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated under the framework
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909624 - 2025-01-30
[PDF]
Review-Memo
examines whether Luis A. Ramirez’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated under the framework
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910800 - 2025-02-03
examines whether Luis A. Ramirez’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated under the framework
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910800 - 2025-02-03
[PDF]
Review-Memo
examines whether Luis A. Ramirez’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated under the framework
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914987 - 2025-02-11
examines whether Luis A. Ramirez’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated under the framework
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914987 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
not “relitigated” in this case, nor were the Milwaukee county “other acts” relitigated here. Speedy Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58813 - 2014-09-15
not “relitigated” in this case, nor were the Milwaukee county “other acts” relitigated here. Speedy Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58813 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Keefe S. Adams
, 1995. On December 7, 1994, Adams, acting pro se, filed a motion demanding a speedy trial pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10950 - 2017-09-19
, 1995. On December 7, 1994, Adams, acting pro se, filed a motion demanding a speedy trial pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10950 - 2017-09-19
State v. Keefe S. Adams
a motion demanding a speedy trial pursuant to the federal and state constitutions and §§ 971.10 and 971.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10950 - 2005-03-31
a motion demanding a speedy trial pursuant to the federal and state constitutions and §§ 971.10 and 971.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10950 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
against Mary K. Benz due to the denial of Benz’s right to a speedy trial. The State argues it should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63029 - 2011-04-26
against Mary K. Benz due to the denial of Benz’s right to a speedy trial. The State argues it should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63029 - 2011-04-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Benz due to the denial of Benz’s right to a speedy trial. The State argues it should not be faulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63029 - 2014-09-15
. Benz due to the denial of Benz’s right to a speedy trial. The State argues it should not be faulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63029 - 2014-09-15