Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2301 - 2310 of 63529 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the evidence, a digital recording, was neither apparently nor potentially exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23

State v. Anthony J. Leitner
)[2] require district attorneys and law enforcement agencies to expunge their records documenting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16400 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Leitner
attorneys and law enforcement agencies to expunge their records documenting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16400 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tyler J. K.
to the plain text of Wis. Stat. § 118.125(2)(f) (2003-04),[1] confidential pupil records may be subpoenaed only
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1235 - 2005-01-25

[PDF] State v. Tyler J. K.
of WIS. STAT. § 118.125(2)(f) (2003-04), 1 confidential pupil records may be subpoenaed only after
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1235 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Guiding Principles on the Use of Digital Audio Recording
GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON THE USE OF DIGITAL AUDIO RECORDING (DAR
/publications/guides/docs/darguidingprinciples.pdf - 2023-03-29

[PDF] NOTICE
exculpatory No. 2008AP2535-CR 2 evidence. We conclude that the evidence, a digital recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47193 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
. Stat. § 19.37(1)(a) (2011-12)[3] of Wisconsin's public records law[4] after the Commission denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143337 - 2015-06-17

[PDF] Frontsheet
2 action under Wis. Stat. § 19.37(1)(a) (2011-12)3 of Wisconsin's public records law4 after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143337 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 15-02 supporting memo
court clerks to destroy a record document 48 hours after it has been electronically or optically
/supreme/docs/1502petitionsupport.pdf - 2015-06-23