Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23001 - 23010 of 97721 for court records search online.
Search results 23001 - 23010 of 97721 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77683 - 2012-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77683 - 2012-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 12, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 12, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35688 - 2009-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35688 - 2009-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings “only if they are clearly erroneous and unsupported by the record”). ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114192 - 2014-06-10
court’s factual findings “only if they are clearly erroneous and unsupported by the record”). ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114192 - 2014-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
by the facts of record.” Id. ¶24 We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120484 - 2014-08-27
by the facts of record.” Id. ¶24 We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120484 - 2014-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
with the State that the record and circumstances support the court’s determination. There are several reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94010 - 2007-06-12
with the State that the record and circumstances support the court’s determination. There are several reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94010 - 2007-06-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 24, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48076 - 2008-01-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 24, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48076 - 2008-01-03
COURT OF APPEALS
them significant because at the original sentencing the court believed Peebles had no prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
them significant because at the original sentencing the court believed Peebles had no prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court calendar and case synopses
in the record to support the circuit court's findings that the County met its burden of proof. D.E.W
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac0324.pdf - 2024-03-01
in the record to support the circuit court's findings that the County met its burden of proof. D.E.W
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac0324.pdf - 2024-03-01
Stephen V. Hannigan v. Sundby Pharmacy, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14134 - 2005-03-31