Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23001 - 23010 of 29942 for des.
Search results 23001 - 23010 of 29942 for des.
Janice M. Dunn v. Milwaukee County
perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method employed by circuit courts. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7193 - 2005-03-31
perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method employed by circuit courts. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7193 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
2007 WI APP 17
, we generally review issues of statutory construction de novo. Coutts, 209 Wis. 2d at 663. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27364 - 2007-01-30
, we generally review issues of statutory construction de novo. Coutts, 209 Wis. 2d at 663. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27364 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Roy J. Jones
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13720 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13720 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245087 - 2019-08-09
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245087 - 2019-08-09
2007 WI APP 152
This case requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 895.04(4), a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26
This case requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 895.04(4), a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
WI APP 99
OF REVIEW ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo and will affirm the circuit court if the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153581 - 2017-09-21
OF REVIEW ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo and will affirm the circuit court if the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153581 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 117
not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21
not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21