Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23001 - 23010 of 33844 for dismissal.
Search results 23001 - 23010 of 33844 for dismissal.
Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. John S.
contends that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for dismissal based upon the County's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10159 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for dismissal based upon the County's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10159 - 2005-03-31
Ronald Rixmann v. Beverly Dehmer
. MYSE, J. Ronald Rixmann appeals[1] a summary judgment dismissing his declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13596 - 2005-03-31
. MYSE, J. Ronald Rixmann appeals[1] a summary judgment dismissing his declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13596 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Scaro
., was dismissed. No. 99-1002-CR 4 provides a basis for a Terry stop, “a substantial portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15391 - 2017-09-21
., was dismissed. No. 99-1002-CR 4 provides a basis for a Terry stop, “a substantial portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15391 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven A. Hipwood
. Hipwood moved to dismiss the criminal charges, arguing that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10297 - 2005-03-31
. Hipwood moved to dismiss the criminal charges, arguing that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10297 - 2005-03-31
Mary Kay McCallum v. Marathon County Board of Adjustment
dismissed consideration of some of the factors as not within its power. The board’s refusal to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4015 - 2005-03-31
dismissed consideration of some of the factors as not within its power. The board’s refusal to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4015 - 2005-03-31
John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their cause of action against John Kaishian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their cause of action against John Kaishian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
count of false imprisonment, were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The circuit court ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050559 - 2025-12-16
count of false imprisonment, were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The circuit court ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050559 - 2025-12-16
CA Blank Order
). There is no indication of any such defect here. In exchange for Beasley’s no-contest pleas, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98210 - 2013-06-12
). There is no indication of any such defect here. In exchange for Beasley’s no-contest pleas, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98210 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
State v. Bruce M. Saks
’ no contest plea the penalty enhancer on each count would be dismissed. The prosecution agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12890 - 2017-09-21
’ no contest plea the penalty enhancer on each count would be dismissed. The prosecution agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12890 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appellate Court COVID-19 order
the petition for review to dismissal. The time period for responses to petitions for review will begin upon
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17
the petition for review to dismissal. The time period for responses to petitions for review will begin upon
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17