Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23021 - 23030 of 69450 for as he.
Search results 23021 - 23030 of 69450 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. James R.K.
R.K. appeals from an order determining that he owes over $46,000 in past child support. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4445 - 2017-09-19
R.K. appeals from an order determining that he owes over $46,000 in past child support. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4445 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
his motions to suppress. He contends the arresting officer lacked probable cause. Kolstad further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30353 - 2007-09-24
his motions to suppress. He contends the arresting officer lacked probable cause. Kolstad further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30353 - 2007-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the circuit court indicating that he wished to withdraw his pleas because his trial counsel had allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
to the circuit court indicating that he wished to withdraw his pleas because his trial counsel had allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
Mark N. Stach v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
by substantial evidence, we affirm. Stach worked as a pallet-sorter at Gateway Foods. He had a history of job
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11405 - 2005-03-31
by substantial evidence, we affirm. Stach worked as a pallet-sorter at Gateway Foods. He had a history of job
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11405 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, fourth offense. He moved to suppress the evidence, alleging Oberg illegally detained him. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70617 - 2014-09-15
, fourth offense. He moved to suppress the evidence, alleging Oberg illegally detained him. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70617 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shah N. Mian
, and from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that “[t]he trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15276 - 2005-03-31
, and from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that “[t]he trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101290 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101290 - 2017-09-21
Alvin M. Norton v. Thomas W. Hoilien
the contract void. Norton argues that Thomas and Laurel’s suit is frivolous and that he should be awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13290 - 2005-03-31
the contract void. Norton argues that Thomas and Laurel’s suit is frivolous and that he should be awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13290 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2023
the following day, and the SPD office determined he qualified for representation. However, due
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714565 - 2023-10-10
the following day, and the SPD office determined he qualified for representation. However, due
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714565 - 2023-10-10
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the following day, and the SPD office determined he qualified for representation. However, due
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsoct2023.pdf - 2023-09-15
the following day, and the SPD office determined he qualified for representation. However, due
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsoct2023.pdf - 2023-09-15