Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23031 - 23040 of 30245 for de.
Search results 23031 - 23040 of 30245 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
to interpret and apply condemnation statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36258 - 2009-04-22
to interpret and apply condemnation statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36258 - 2009-04-22
Green County Department of Human Services v. David L.
on April 5, 2000, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Green County Dep’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3748 - 2005-03-31
on April 5, 2000, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Green County Dep’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of liberty is a question of law we decide de novo. Waukesha County v. S.L.L., 2019 WI 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05
of liberty is a question of law we decide de novo. Waukesha County v. S.L.L., 2019 WI 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05
State v. Mary E. Schoate
for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12152 - 2005-03-31
for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12152 - 2005-03-31
Matthew Verdoljak v. Mosinee Paper Corporation
the recreational use statute to the undisputed facts which presents a question of law requiring de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16951 - 2005-03-31
the recreational use statute to the undisputed facts which presents a question of law requiring de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16951 - 2005-03-31
Patricia Capsavage v. Raymond J. Esser
, this is a question of law and one this court reviews de novo.” GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold, 215 Wis.2d 459, 470
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13090 - 2005-03-31
, this is a question of law and one this court reviews de novo.” GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold, 215 Wis.2d 459, 470
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13090 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). We review de novo whether the court correctly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82884 - 2012-05-23
they are clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). We review de novo whether the court correctly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82884 - 2012-05-23
State v. Nicole A. Fassbender
. 2d 655, 663, 462 N.W.2d 906 (Ct. App. 1990). However, this court decides de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26288 - 2006-08-23
. 2d 655, 663, 462 N.W.2d 906 (Ct. App. 1990). However, this court decides de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26288 - 2006-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31872 - 2008-02-18
: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31872 - 2008-02-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
the defendant’s motion de novo to determine whether it alleges facts sufficient to warrant an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28145 - 2014-09-15
the defendant’s motion de novo to determine whether it alleges facts sufficient to warrant an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28145 - 2014-09-15