Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23031 - 23040 of 29942 for des.
Search results 23031 - 23040 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
Barbara Doyle v. Ronald A. Arthur
damages. As to the amount of the award, Arthur argues that because Doyle’s actual damage was “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13276 - 2017-09-21
damages. As to the amount of the award, Arthur argues that because Doyle’s actual damage was “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13276 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but applies the facts to the law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177416 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but applies the facts to the law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177416 - 2017-09-21
Daniel J. Lorge v. Randy Finger
Whether the court properly interprets a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Hess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21519 - 2006-03-09
Whether the court properly interprets a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Hess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21519 - 2006-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38398 - 2009-07-27
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38398 - 2009-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
provides coverage is a question of insurance contract interpretation subject to de novo review. 1325 N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87314 - 2012-09-19
provides coverage is a question of insurance contract interpretation subject to de novo review. 1325 N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87314 - 2012-09-19
American National Property and Casualty Company v. Marderos Nersesian
consolidated by order of this court. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶13 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7136 - 2005-03-31
consolidated by order of this court. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶13 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. See Reid, 245 Wis. 2d 658, ¶12. ¶8 Voss contends that an award of attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53888 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See Reid, 245 Wis. 2d 658, ¶12. ¶8 Voss contends that an award of attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53888 - 2014-09-15
Dwaine Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Association
, however, presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14419 - 2005-03-31
, however, presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Herbert M. Schauer v. Matthew S. Baker
Discussion ¶4 This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5392 - 2017-09-19
Discussion ¶4 This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5392 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Milwaukee Police Association v. Arthur Jones
review the circuit court’s decision de novo. See State ex rel. Schultz v. Wellens, 208 Wis. 2d 574
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14924 - 2017-09-21
review the circuit court’s decision de novo. See State ex rel. Schultz v. Wellens, 208 Wis. 2d 574
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14924 - 2017-09-21