Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23031 - 23040 of 59394 for quit claim deed.
Search results 23031 - 23040 of 59394 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
claims against him for damages under § 146.84, STATS., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 therefore were properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12496 - 2017-09-21
claims against him for damages under § 146.84, STATS., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 therefore were properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12496 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Scott A. Jagodzinski v. Tom Jessup
the claim involved a restoration, not repairs. Next, the court found that a contract existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12231 - 2017-09-21
the claim involved a restoration, not repairs. Next, the court found that a contract existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12231 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian A. Gleiter
his guilty plea based on his claim that he did not understand the sexual contact element of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25478 - 2017-09-21
his guilty plea based on his claim that he did not understand the sexual contact element of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report addresses whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that: (1) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913866 - 2025-02-12
. The no-merit report addresses whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that: (1) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913866 - 2025-02-12
Village of Waterford v. Kurt J. Doerr
trial. Without specification, he claimed that his Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13708 - 2005-03-31
trial. Without specification, he claimed that his Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13708 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antonio Jackson
Jackson claims that the prosecutor: (1) on at least three occasions, improperly vouched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
Jackson claims that the prosecutor: (1) on at least three occasions, improperly vouched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
Scott A. Jagodzinski v. Tom Jessup
because the claim involved a restoration, not repairs. Next, the court found that a contract existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12231 - 2005-03-31
because the claim involved a restoration, not repairs. Next, the court found that a contract existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
termination of [N.C.’s] parental rights, at this time, N.C. is amending her motion to include a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196836 - 2017-09-21
termination of [N.C.’s] parental rights, at this time, N.C. is amending her motion to include a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not raise his claim sooner. Specifically, he argued that the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126926 - 2017-09-21
did not raise his claim sooner. Specifically, he argued that the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
injuries the victim received,3 the relative lack of injuries observed on Gonzalez who was claiming self
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705850 - 2023-09-27
injuries the victim received,3 the relative lack of injuries observed on Gonzalez who was claiming self
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705850 - 2023-09-27