Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23041 - 23050 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. John E. Stephens
that we review de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County, 176 Wis.2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9457 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Public Service Corporation v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
the policy's pollution exclusion applies. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. Park Bancorporation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9460 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Sebastian Frank Bustamante
110, 113 (Ct. App. 1988). On appeal, we review the trial court's determination de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152864 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.5 State v. Stynes, 2003 WI 65, ¶11, 262 Wis. 2d 335, 665 N.W.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640715 - 2023-04-04

[PDF] WI App 49
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Darby, 2009 WI App 50, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 478, 766 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215703 - 2018-09-07

State v. Brandon J. Matke
of his constitutional right of due process, a question we also decide de novo. State v. Navarro, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6804 - 2005-03-31

State v. Frank Miles
of a statute presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher J. Drexler
. Whether a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8836 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo. Hicks v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206004 - 2017-12-21