Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23041 - 23050 of 29714 for des.
Search results 23041 - 23050 of 29714 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutionality of statutes de novo, but they are presumed constitutional. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15
the constitutionality of statutes de novo, but they are presumed constitutional. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 152
. § 895.04(4), a question of law that we review de novo. See Estate of Holt v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29238 - 2014-09-15
. § 895.04(4), a question of law that we review de novo. See Estate of Holt v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29238 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Iowa County Department of Human Services v. Mary M.K.
court is a question of law which we review de novo. See Thomas Y. v. Saint Croix County, 175 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2164 - 2017-09-19
court is a question of law which we review de novo. See Thomas Y. v. Saint Croix County, 175 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2164 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3493 - 2017-09-20
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3493 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2020AP188-CR 5 unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298202 - 2020-10-22
No. 2020AP188-CR 5 unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298202 - 2020-10-22
State v. Michael Brandt
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2044-CR Complete Titl...
question is decided de novo. Id. A defendant’s disappointment with the sentence received after the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100162 - 2014-03-09
question is decided de novo. Id. A defendant’s disappointment with the sentence received after the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100162 - 2014-03-09
St. Clare Hospital of Monroe v. City of Monroe
of the term "used as a doctor's office" is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10533 - 2005-03-31
of the term "used as a doctor's office" is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew J. K.
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13