Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23051 - 23060 of 29942 for des.
Search results 23051 - 23060 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance. ¶15 An attorney’s performance is deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114116 - 2017-09-21
decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance. ¶15 An attorney’s performance is deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114116 - 2017-09-21
Tammy Turner v. Gene Dencker Buick-Pontiac, Inc.
in relation to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16274 - 2005-03-31
in relation to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03
that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Harris, 2008 WI 15, ¶96, 307 Wis. 2d 555
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102446 - 2013-09-30
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Harris, 2008 WI 15, ¶96, 307 Wis. 2d 555
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102446 - 2013-09-30
William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
. Although we have been assisted by the trial court's well-reasoned written opinion, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11483 - 2005-03-31
. Although we have been assisted by the trial court's well-reasoned written opinion, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶14 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶14 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 225
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30370 - 2007-10-30
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30370 - 2007-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the issues requires statutory construction, “‘they present questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100036 - 2017-09-21
of the issues requires statutory construction, “‘they present questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100036 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
contempt power presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Evans, 267 Wis 2d 596, ¶16. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30124 - 2014-09-15
contempt power presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Evans, 267 Wis 2d 596, ¶16. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30124 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 90
affirm. DISCUSSION ¶5 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51338 - 2014-09-15
affirm. DISCUSSION ¶5 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51338 - 2014-09-15