Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23051 - 23060 of 57358 for id.

[PDF] Otto Mogged III v. Margaret A. Mogged
). “[F]inality is important and … subsection (h) should be used sparingly.” Id. at 550. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3417 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that verified his understanding and that the pleas were knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. See id., ¶35
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144292 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
deficient. Id.; State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95554 - 2013-04-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. See id., ¶28 (“Spot zoning has been characterized both as a necessary device to provide flexibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26911 - 2006-10-25

COURT OF APPEALS
upon its face evidence of its unreliability,” corroborating evidence is necessary. Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28686 - 2007-04-11

COURT OF APPEALS
rational reasons for its decision and based its decision on facts in the record.” Id. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54971 - 2010-09-29

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey L. Triggs
to the trial judge at the time of the original sentencing ....” Id. (citation omitted). A change in parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12665 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Lee
that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Id. at 309-11. Whether the allegations of the motion are sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6982 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. William Goodman
). We first examine the complaint to determine whether a claim for relief has been stated. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5898 - 2017-09-19

County of Sheboygan v. Research Universal Life Church
.2d 442, 457, 480 N.W.2d 16, 22 (1992). The taxpayer has the burden of proving tax exempt status. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9789 - 2005-03-31