Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23051 - 23060 of 63981 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with Johnson’s character, noting that Johnson “has nothing short of an atrocious criminal record,” a “history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187277 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
that the statement as recorded by Rhinehart had been disclosed to Koopmans. On November 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8317 - 2005-03-31

G. Curt Borgwardt v. Ralph Redlin
the record is not clear, presumably counsel for Borgwardt and C & S Graphics examined or copied the documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8179 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision] … and there must be support for that reasoning in the record.”). ¶13 Charlene contends we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212597 - 2018-05-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, thereby allowing the court to make some record of its decision in admitting the three other acts. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246181 - 2019-09-04

State v. Mary H.
if the record demonstrates that the court has examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2183 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that according to the 911 dispatch record card, Bauer’s call was received by dispatch at 11:35 p.m. and the EMTs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68848 - 2011-08-01

The Kraemer Company, LLC v. Sauk County Board of Adjustment
Company that “quarrying” includes the marketing and selling of the extracted rock, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3056 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, that “the entirety of the interrogation should have been suppressed.” Zarm, however, cites nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28785 - 2007-04-23

State v. Raymond L. Matzker
that introduction of psychiatric testimony and medical records in this case violated the physician-patient privilege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8366 - 2005-03-31