Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23061 - 23070 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 23061 - 23070 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Johnson claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118318 - 2014-09-15
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Johnson claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118318 - 2014-09-15
State v. William E. Marberry
of Health and Family Services (DHFS) for institutional care under ch. 980, Stats. Marberry claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31
of Health and Family Services (DHFS) for institutional care under ch. 980, Stats. Marberry claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Kelnhofer
and that the 1995 warrant was further flawed because it was premised on false information. Kelnhofer also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10937 - 2017-09-20
and that the 1995 warrant was further flawed because it was premised on false information. Kelnhofer also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10937 - 2017-09-20
City of Sheboygan v. Mary Nell Matzdorf
a crime. We conclude that Matzdorf has the requisite standing to assert a Fourth Amendment claim. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12760 - 2005-03-31
a crime. We conclude that Matzdorf has the requisite standing to assert a Fourth Amendment claim. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12760 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith Schroeder
of this appeal. ¶5 Schroeder raises five arguments. First, he claims that Sokel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31
of this appeal. ¶5 Schroeder raises five arguments. First, he claims that Sokel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerrit L. Brown
with H.N.L. that afternoon, but claimed that this happened after “they started to make out.” ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25087 - 2006-05-08
with H.N.L. that afternoon, but claimed that this happened after “they started to make out.” ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25087 - 2006-05-08
Christen Michaela Shannon v. United Services Automobile Association
of the entire settlement. We reject their claim because the order approving a minor's settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7992 - 2014-01-08
of the entire settlement. We reject their claim because the order approving a minor's settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7992 - 2014-01-08
State v. Keith Schroeder
of this appeal. ¶5 Schroeder raises five arguments. First, he claims that Sokel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31
of this appeal. ¶5 Schroeder raises five arguments. First, he claims that Sokel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31
Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
building in Milwaukee County, to recover rent that it claims was improperly withheld by Howard, Needles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8135 - 2005-03-31
building in Milwaukee County, to recover rent that it claims was improperly withheld by Howard, Needles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8135 - 2005-03-31
Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
building in Milwaukee County, to recover rent that it claims was improperly withheld by Howard, Needles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-11-15
building in Milwaukee County, to recover rent that it claims was improperly withheld by Howard, Needles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-11-15