Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23071 - 23080 of 69083 for as he.
Search results 23071 - 23080 of 69083 for as he.
CA Blank Order
of conviction and sentence for two counts of child enticement. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109618 - 2014-03-24
of conviction and sentence for two counts of child enticement. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109618 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
We affirm. Prude first argues that he did not receive adequate notice of the charge. The conduct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149491 - 2017-09-21
We affirm. Prude first argues that he did not receive adequate notice of the charge. The conduct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149491 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul R. Brzycki
. Brzycki appeals from a judgment entered after he pled guilty to one count of burglary and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7198 - 2005-03-31
. Brzycki appeals from a judgment entered after he pled guilty to one count of burglary and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7198 - 2005-03-31
John M. Langer v.
and practices in Baraboo. In 1992, he consented to a private reprimand imposed by the Board for failing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17187 - 2005-03-31
and practices in Baraboo. In 1992, he consented to a private reprimand imposed by the Board for failing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17187 - 2005-03-31
Barbara Ann Villwock v. Robert M. Villwock
appeals pro se from a judgment of divorce from Barbara Ann Villwock. He argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11577 - 2005-03-31
appeals pro se from a judgment of divorce from Barbara Ann Villwock. He argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11577 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ultimately revoked, and he began serving his revocation sentence on August 16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
was ultimately revoked, and he began serving his revocation sentence on August 16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
State v. Marcellous Walker
. Because he is not entitled to a jury trial, because the State did have probable cause under § 980.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25050 - 2006-05-08
. Because he is not entitled to a jury trial, because the State did have probable cause under § 980.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25050 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of felony failure to pay child support, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 948.22(2). He entered no-contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117324 - 2017-09-21
of felony failure to pay child support, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 948.22(2). He entered no-contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marcellous Walker
right to confrontation. Because he is not entitled to a jury trial, because the State did have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25050 - 2017-09-21
right to confrontation. Because he is not entitled to a jury trial, because the State did have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David W. Oakley
William A. Bablitch withdraws the sixth sentence in paragraph 33 from his concurrence: "He has abused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21
William A. Bablitch withdraws the sixth sentence in paragraph 33 from his concurrence: "He has abused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21