Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23071 - 23080 of 33841 for dismissal.
Search results 23071 - 23080 of 33841 for dismissal.
State v. Steven A. Hipwood
. Hipwood moved to dismiss the criminal charges, arguing that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10297 - 2005-03-31
. Hipwood moved to dismiss the criminal charges, arguing that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10297 - 2005-03-31
Keith A. Brown v. Classic Inns of Wisconsin, Inc.
a judgment entered after a jury trial, dismissing his complaint against the respondents, Classic Inns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3939 - 2005-03-31
a judgment entered after a jury trial, dismissing his complaint against the respondents, Classic Inns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3939 - 2005-03-31
Mary Kay McCallum v. Marathon County Board of Adjustment
dismissed consideration of some of the factors as not within its power. The board’s refusal to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4015 - 2005-03-31
dismissed consideration of some of the factors as not within its power. The board’s refusal to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4015 - 2005-03-31
John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their cause of action against John Kaishian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their cause of action against John Kaishian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31
Jeff Pettis v. John Close
in the same suit, but his claim was dismissed by stipulation of the parties and is not before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3609 - 2005-03-31
in the same suit, but his claim was dismissed by stipulation of the parties and is not before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
count of false imprisonment, were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The circuit court ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050559 - 2025-12-16
count of false imprisonment, were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The circuit court ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050559 - 2025-12-16
CA Blank Order
). There is no indication of any such defect here. In exchange for Beasley’s no-contest pleas, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98210 - 2013-06-12
). There is no indication of any such defect here. In exchange for Beasley’s no-contest pleas, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98210 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
State v. Bruce M. Saks
’ no contest plea the penalty enhancer on each count would be dismissed. The prosecution agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12890 - 2017-09-21
’ no contest plea the penalty enhancer on each count would be dismissed. The prosecution agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12890 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appellate Court COVID-19 order
the petition for review to dismissal. The time period for responses to petitions for review will begin upon
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17
the petition for review to dismissal. The time period for responses to petitions for review will begin upon
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
2022-OLR-3
charge was dismissed on the prosecutor’s motion. Lawrynk’s sentence included 40 days jail, with 30
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/lawrynk.pdf - 2022-06-20
charge was dismissed on the prosecutor’s motion. Lawrynk’s sentence included 40 days jail, with 30
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/lawrynk.pdf - 2022-06-20