Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23081 - 23090 of 38324 for t's.
Search results 23081 - 23090 of 38324 for t's.
State v. Mark G. Willard
directive from the supervising physician prior to each blood draw. We concluded: [T]he procedure used here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18920 - 2005-07-12
directive from the supervising physician prior to each blood draw. We concluded: [T]he procedure used here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18920 - 2005-07-12
Steven J. Bohr v. Connie R. Bohr
), the court expressly held that “[t]he trial court must evaluate and include the pension interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10792 - 2005-03-31
), the court expressly held that “[t]he trial court must evaluate and include the pension interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
custodian.… [T]he court shall consider the following factors in making its determination: 1. The wishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33343 - 2014-09-15
custodian.… [T]he court shall consider the following factors in making its determination: 1. The wishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245613 - 2019-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245613 - 2019-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the untried charge of substantial battery. The memo also provided, “[T]hey are unwilling to extradite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76098 - 2014-09-15
for the untried charge of substantial battery. The memo also provided, “[T]hey are unwilling to extradite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76098 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald R. MacClymont v. Harriet J. Gilligan
. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Washington County: RICHARD T. BECKER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Washington County: RICHARD T. BECKER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
2012 [t]erm to rebut the presumption” of nonresidency. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
2012 [t]erm to rebut the presumption” of nonresidency. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Vincent J. Longo
of the damage to the car. The State argues that “[t]he Officer could reasonably believe, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14875 - 2017-09-21
of the damage to the car. The State argues that “[t]he Officer could reasonably believe, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14875 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was necessary here. We have consistently held that “[t]he question of probable cause must be assessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
was necessary here. We have consistently held that “[t]he question of probable cause must be assessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
resentencing. ... [T]he Constitution does not ensure perfect accuracy.” See United States ex rel. Villa v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
resentencing. ... [T]he Constitution does not ensure perfect accuracy.” See United States ex rel. Villa v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29