Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23091 - 23100 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23091 - 23100 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth P. Sarauer
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶7, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6136 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶7, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6136 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011128 - 2025-09-16
of law that we review de novo. Id. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011128 - 2025-09-16
2008 WI APP 118
review de novo. Breier v. E.C., 130 Wis. 2d 376, 381, 387 N.W2d 72 (1986). Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33090 - 2011-06-14
review de novo. Breier v. E.C., 130 Wis. 2d 376, 381, 387 N.W2d 72 (1986). Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33090 - 2011-06-14
Cemetery Services v. The Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing
of statutory interpretation, or the application of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12773 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, or the application of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12773 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 179 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30858 - 2007-11-13
de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 179 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30858 - 2007-11-13
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation v. James Eisold
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farm v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10476 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farm v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Associated/F&M Bank v. Ray A. Johnson
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3864 - 2017-09-20
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3864 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Edward P. Barnes v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
de novo whether the sanction of dismissal was the appropriate remedy in this case. “A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19971 - 2017-09-21
de novo whether the sanction of dismissal was the appropriate remedy in this case. “A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutionality of statutes de novo, but they are presumed constitutional. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15
the constitutionality of statutes de novo, but they are presumed constitutional. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mary E. Schoate
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21