Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23091 - 23100 of 46075 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 23091 - 23100 of 46075 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defense.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212759 - 2018-05-15
the defense.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212759 - 2018-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
then argues that the circuit court failed to apply a balancing test and give consideration to the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32526 - 2008-04-23
then argues that the circuit court failed to apply a balancing test and give consideration to the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32526 - 2008-04-23
State v. Michael A. Smaxwell
N.W.2d 369 (1968).[2] The test for determining the sufficiency of a complaint is common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15924 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 369 (1968).[2] The test for determining the sufficiency of a complaint is common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15924 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
explanations for the injuries Mina sustained. Thus, facially the first prong of the two-pronged test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
explanations for the injuries Mina sustained. Thus, facially the first prong of the two-pronged test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony K. Murphy
. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). We address Murphy’s ineffective-assistance claims under this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26099 - 2017-09-21
. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). We address Murphy’s ineffective-assistance claims under this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26099 - 2017-09-21
City of Madison v. Timothy J. Duffy
reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis Jones
result. Third, our holding creates a “bright-line” test that is easy to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12322 - 2005-03-31
result. Third, our holding creates a “bright-line” test that is easy to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brent R. Reed
but was unable to find him. Id. Deputy Otto asked Reed to exit his vehicle and perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16
but was unable to find him. Id. Deputy Otto asked Reed to exit his vehicle and perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
apply a two-step test to determine whether issue preclusion bars a litigant’s claim: (1) can issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82231 - 2012-05-15
apply a two-step test to determine whether issue preclusion bars a litigant’s claim: (1) can issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82231 - 2012-05-15
State v. Enrique Vizcaino
is a commonsense test. The test is an objective one, and the suspicion must be grounded in specific, articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25988 - 2006-07-25
is a commonsense test. The test is an objective one, and the suspicion must be grounded in specific, articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25988 - 2006-07-25