Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2311 - 2320 of 95297 for Shawano County Case Search.
Search results 2311 - 2320 of 95297 for Shawano County Case Search.
Brown County v. Marcella G.
2001 WI App 194 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 01-0956, 01-0957
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3819 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 194 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 01-0956, 01-0957
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3819 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: WYNNE P. LAUFENBERG, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658222 - 2023-05-24
a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: WYNNE P. LAUFENBERG, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658222 - 2023-05-24
Dane County v. James S.
. The County points out, however, that, unlike the criminal cases James cites in support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13914 - 2005-03-31
. The County points out, however, that, unlike the criminal cases James cites in support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County v. James S.
granted “summary judgment” to the County, which is improper in termination cases. See In re Philip W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13914 - 2014-09-15
granted “summary judgment” to the County, which is improper in termination cases. See In re Philip W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13914 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kimberly Sotelo
search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We therefore reverse the order granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9223 - 2005-03-31
search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We therefore reverse the order granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9223 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly Sotelo
Belton2 bright-line rule, the police officer's search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9223 - 2017-09-19
Belton2 bright-line rule, the police officer's search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9223 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lisa Orta
), was a watershed in Wisconsin law. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17316 - 2005-03-31
), was a watershed in Wisconsin law. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ricardo Ruiz
. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two officers detected the odor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17317 - 2017-09-21
. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two officers detected the odor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17317 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ricardo Ruiz
), was a watershed in Wisconsin law. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17317 - 2005-03-31
), was a watershed in Wisconsin law. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lisa Orta
. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two officers detected the odor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17316 - 2017-09-21
. The case concerned the search of an automobile for illegal alcohol. Two officers detected the odor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17316 - 2017-09-21