Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2311 - 2320 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2311 - 2320 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
David C. Myers v. Daren Swenson
test the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint. We review such motions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6858 - 2017-09-20
test the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint. We review such motions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6858 - 2017-09-20
Shannon Preston v. Meriter Hospital, Inc.
review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6512 - 2005-03-31
review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ray M. Thompson v. WI Department of Public Instruction
of this decision, the trial court reversed. The court reviewed the superintendent's conclusions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8384 - 2017-09-19
of this decision, the trial court reversed. The court reviewed the superintendent's conclusions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
(1994). The band argues that (1) our standard of review is de novo, and (2) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16189 - 2017-09-21
(1994). The band argues that (1) our standard of review is de novo, and (2) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether Pendelton was “seized” for Fourth Amendment purposes is reviewed de novo. 4 See id. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214283 - 2018-06-19
of whether Pendelton was “seized” for Fourth Amendment purposes is reviewed de novo. 4 See id. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214283 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of waiver to these findings is a question of law that we review de novo. Meyer v. Classified Ins. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90881 - 2014-09-15
of waiver to these findings is a question of law that we review de novo. Meyer v. Classified Ins. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90881 - 2014-09-15
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
Scott R. Bunker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
on undisputed facts de novo, and therefore it is not essential to the court’s review that the agency had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4728 - 2005-03-31
on undisputed facts de novo, and therefore it is not essential to the court’s review that the agency had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Constitution to undisputed facts. Therefore, we are presented with issues of law that we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48431 - 2014-09-15
Constitution to undisputed facts. Therefore, we are presented with issues of law that we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48431 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
court’s decision denying the State’s motion to revoke on my de novo review, I do not separately address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24
court’s decision denying the State’s motion to revoke on my de novo review, I do not separately address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24