Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23101 - 23110 of 70126 for his.
Search results 23101 - 23110 of 70126 for his.
State v. Douglas Royster
. PER CURIAM. Douglas Royster appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his no-contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. Douglas Royster appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his no-contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
into the kitchen and told Reismer that as he was picking the child up from his crib, the child slipped. Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27928 - 2007-01-29
into the kitchen and told Reismer that as he was picking the child up from his crib, the child slipped. Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27928 - 2007-01-29
CA Blank Order
child support, that he would be required at a hearing on June 25, 2012, to show cause for his failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95747 - 2013-04-17
child support, that he would be required at a hearing on June 25, 2012, to show cause for his failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95747 - 2013-04-17
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Bradley, JJ. Clifford Beasley appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered upon his guilty pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147197 - 2017-09-21
and Bradley, JJ. Clifford Beasley appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered upon his guilty pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147197 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not present for his initial appearance on January 28, 2014, but he was present on March 27, 2014, to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
was not present for his initial appearance on January 28, 2014, but he was present on March 27, 2014, to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keith Griffin
erred when it denied his motion to suppress an incriminating statement given to a staff advocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11291 - 2005-03-31
erred when it denied his motion to suppress an incriminating statement given to a staff advocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11291 - 2005-03-31