Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23111 - 23120 of 53831 for Mean To Clean, 877 W Minneola Ave.

[PDF] City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
is defined in sec. 340.01(68) … to mean, ‘… vehicles and other conveyances, either singly or together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5951 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 164
within the meaning of the regulation. WP&L asserts that the sewer lift stations cannot be “customers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42781 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
... derived from intrastate operations" within the meaning of § 196.85(2). We conclude the PSC's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19

2009 WI APP 164
by the City were “customers” of the City electric utility within the meaning of the regulation. WP&L asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42781 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] Sharal Y. Doepke-Kline v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
was an individual with a disability within the meaning of WIS. STAT. § 111.32(8), 1 and the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19340 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
with the language of the statute and give it its common meaning, unless there are technical or specially defined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42805 - 2009-10-28

[PDF] WI APP 46
meaning. He further supports his argument by appealing to § 343.305(5)(d), which affirmatively grants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168314 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Chauncer L. Smith
, a practical or sensible meaning may be given to the …[law].” State v. Arnold, 217 Wis. 340, 345, 258 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11566 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] David Schultz v. Astrazeneca Insurance Company, Ltd.
, 683 N.W.2d 75. We give the words in the policy their common and ordinary meaning so that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21672 - 2017-09-21

David Schultz v. Astrazeneca Insurance Company, Ltd.
in the policy their common and ordinary meaning so that our construction conforms to the understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21672 - 2006-03-07