Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23111 - 23120 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23111 - 23120 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 98
of law we review de novo. Xcel Energy Servs., Inc. v. LIRC, 2013 WI 64, ¶24, 349 Wis. 2d 234, 833 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153081 - 2017-09-21
of law we review de novo. Xcel Energy Servs., Inc. v. LIRC, 2013 WI 64, ¶24, 349 Wis. 2d 234, 833 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153081 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel T. Shea
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. at 73-74. ¶16 In this case, the parties agree the criminal complaint adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
de novo. Id. at 73-74. ¶16 In this case, the parties agree the criminal complaint adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
State v. Roy J. Jones
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13720 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13720 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
turns upon a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72981 - 2011-11-01
turns upon a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72981 - 2011-11-01
[PDF]
WI APP 12
8 we review de novo. Cf. id. And because the word “contact” is not defined in the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132253 - 2017-09-21
8 we review de novo. Cf. id. And because the word “contact” is not defined in the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous but reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679069 - 2023-07-19
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous but reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679069 - 2023-07-19
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo. Id., ¶¶14-15 (citations and quotation marks omitted). ¶21 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104307 - 2013-11-18
principles to those facts de novo. Id., ¶¶14-15 (citations and quotation marks omitted). ¶21 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104307 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents questions of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Arberry, 2018 WI 7, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207787 - 2018-02-01
presents questions of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Arberry, 2018 WI 7, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207787 - 2018-02-01
[PDF]
Tony D. Walker v. Gary R. McCaughtry
de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393, 617 N.W.2d 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2640 - 2017-09-19
de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393, 617 N.W.2d 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2640 - 2017-09-19