Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23111 - 23120 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 23111 - 23120 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
John F. Bausch v. John Husz
of the Wisconsin Parole Commission. Bausch claimed damages for Husz's alleged violation of the open records law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8551 - 2005-03-31
of the Wisconsin Parole Commission. Bausch claimed damages for Husz's alleged violation of the open records law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the records, the court concludes that the record does not show arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097531 - 2026-03-26
review of the records, the court concludes that the record does not show arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097531 - 2026-03-26
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91599 - 2013-01-10
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91599 - 2013-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP978-CRNM 2 independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976129 - 2025-07-01
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP978-CRNM 2 independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976129 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725125 - 2023-11-07
independent review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725125 - 2023-11-07
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132251 - 2014-12-29
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132251 - 2014-12-29
[PDF]
State v. Mark J. Modory
against him.” He contends that the language in § 343.23(2), STATS., provides that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
against him.” He contends that the language in § 343.23(2), STATS., provides that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218693 - 2018-09-04
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218693 - 2018-09-04