Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23111 - 23120 of 57333 for id.

CA Blank Order
understanding and that the pleas were knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, see id., ¶35, and properly looked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record, including the previous comments at the first sentencing.’” Id., ¶9 (emphasis in Reynolds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426094 - 2021-09-16

State v. Joseph A. Roe
not. Id. at 360, 444 N.W.2d at 435. Rather, the objective facts before the officer need only lead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10637 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to raise an available claim in an earlier motion or on direct appeal.” Id., ¶36. However, “a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927357 - 2025-03-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sufficient facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168856 - 2017-09-21

Otto Mogged III v. Margaret A. Mogged
) should be used sparingly.” Id. at 550. “[T]he ‘extraordinary circumstances’ test is an appropriate way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3417 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael Galletto
trial, dismissal of the charges is required.” Id. at 509-10 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 522). I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3213 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We conclude that this was not a broker/agent relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29258 - 2014-09-15

State v. Lavell D. Love
the defendant's ability to resist.’” Id., ¶18. ¶5 Coercive or improper police conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26085 - 2006-08-02

COURT OF APPEALS
would have considered himself or herself to be in custody. Id., ¶11 (citations omitted). ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29085 - 2007-05-22