Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23121 - 23130 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶32, 301 Wis. 2d 642, 734 N.W.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372620 - 2021-06-02

[PDF] Addison Insurance Company v. James Korsmo
on a question of law, however, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7535 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Shirley Kroening v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin
N.W.2d 717 (Ct. App. 1989). We review questions of law de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14566 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is harmless are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Coffee, 389 Wis. 2d 627, ¶17. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281589 - 2020-08-25

2007 WI APP 225
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30370 - 2007-10-30

Ronald M. Hubbard v. Peot Construction, Inc.
as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16177 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous, but we apply constitutional principle to the facts de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30269 - 2007-09-17

State v. Brandon L. Mason
on the proper construction of the felony murder statute. We review questions of statutory construction de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6957 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the Fifth Amendment, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 221 Wis. 2d 1, 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34789 - 2008-12-08

State v. Frederick W. Prager
of law and our standard of review is de novo. See State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17633 - 2005-05-24