Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23121 - 23130 of 70138 for his.
Search results 23121 - 23130 of 70138 for his.
CA Blank Order
an order denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101751 - 2013-09-10
an order denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101751 - 2013-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
Williams, a/k/a Malone Corey Broshawn, challenges the denial of his suppression motion by appealing from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
Williams, a/k/a Malone Corey Broshawn, challenges the denial of his suppression motion by appealing from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
State v. Danny L. Peterson
his plea-withdrawal motion.[1] The issues are whether Peterson is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19
his plea-withdrawal motion.[1] The issues are whether Peterson is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19
State v. Anthony Alvegas Hamilton
of Hamilton’s clothes as he ran, and that Hamilton appeared to be holding merchandise in his clothes and holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18149 - 2005-05-17
of Hamilton’s clothes as he ran, and that Hamilton appeared to be holding merchandise in his clothes and holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18149 - 2005-05-17
State v. John A. Aschenbrener
to have his testimony excluded because Jurek incorrectly advised Aschenbrener. Jurek stated that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
to have his testimony excluded because Jurek incorrectly advised Aschenbrener. Jurek stated that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and April 2007 while Thomas recovered. Thomas received clearance from his physician to return to work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45689 - 2010-01-11
and April 2007 while Thomas recovered. Thomas received clearance from his physician to return to work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45689 - 2010-01-11
[PDF]
State v. Raymond F. Schordie
from Schordie’s relationship with his former girlfriend, Rhonda Olson, and from a domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11614 - 2017-09-19
from Schordie’s relationship with his former girlfriend, Rhonda Olson, and from a domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11614 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
into the kitchen and told Reismer that as he was picking the child up from his crib, the child slipped. Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27928 - 2014-09-15
into the kitchen and told Reismer that as he was picking the child up from his crib, the child slipped. Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27928 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Keith Griffin
his motion to suppress an incriminating statement given to a staff advocate at the Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11291 - 2017-09-19
his motion to suppress an incriminating statement given to a staff advocate at the Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11291 - 2017-09-19