Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23131 - 23140 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23131 - 23140 of 29713 for des.
WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2044-CR Complete Titl...
question is decided de novo. Id. A defendant’s disappointment with the sentence received after the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100162 - 2014-03-09
question is decided de novo. Id. A defendant’s disappointment with the sentence received after the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100162 - 2014-03-09
St. Clare Hospital of Monroe v. City of Monroe
of the term "used as a doctor's office" is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10533 - 2005-03-31
of the term "used as a doctor's office" is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew J. K.
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13
State v. Gerald A. Edson
of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions. State v. Bergeron, 162 Wis.2d 521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions. State v. Bergeron, 162 Wis.2d 521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case on a de novo basis. See American Family Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106058 - 2017-09-21
for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case on a de novo basis. See American Family Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106058 - 2017-09-21
2011 WI APP 28
with a nonparty witness who has yet to testify. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60384 - 2011-03-29
with a nonparty witness who has yet to testify. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60384 - 2011-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
procedures.[5] See Hoppe, 317 Wis. 2d 161, ¶17 (We consider de novo the sufficiency of the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115241 - 2014-06-23
procedures.[5] See Hoppe, 317 Wis. 2d 161, ¶17 (We consider de novo the sufficiency of the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115241 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
are barred by Escalona-Naranjo in any particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-29
are barred by Escalona-Naranjo in any particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
Pamela E. Rubrich v. Paul J. Piotruszewicz
. ANALYSIS ¶6 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4903 - 2017-09-19
. ANALYSIS ¶6 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4903 - 2017-09-19