Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23131 - 23140 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23131 - 23140 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03
that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
Ronald M. Hubbard v. Peot Construction, Inc.
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16177 - 2017-09-21
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16177 - 2017-09-21
WI App 91 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1944 Complete Title ...
review de novo ‘[w]hether the [c]ity followed the statute in making its assessment.’” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119650 - 2014-09-23
review de novo ‘[w]hether the [c]ity followed the statute in making its assessment.’” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119650 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
Gary K. Smith v. General Casualty Insurance Company
also presents a question of law, which we review de novo while benefiting from the analysis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17411 - 2017-09-21
also presents a question of law, which we review de novo while benefiting from the analysis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17411 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shuron C. Davis
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4789 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4789 - 2017-09-20
Brown County v. Jessica M.
disagree. ¶6 Questions of statutory interpretation present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6634 - 2005-03-31
disagree. ¶6 Questions of statutory interpretation present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6634 - 2005-03-31
State v. John S. Provo
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id. at 128. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id. at 128. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
Luann M. Lawrence v. Wayman C. Lawrence
. Nichols, 162 Wis. 2d 96, 103, 469 N.W. 2d 619 (1991). We review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6622 - 2005-03-31
. Nichols, 162 Wis. 2d 96, 103, 469 N.W. 2d 619 (1991). We review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6622 - 2005-03-31
Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA Associates
of a contract are definite presents a question of law that we review de novo. Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6653 - 2005-03-31
of a contract are definite presents a question of law that we review de novo. Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6653 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Bennett negligent as a matter of law. We review directed verdicts de novo. Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35265 - 2009-01-20
Bennett negligent as a matter of law. We review directed verdicts de novo. Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35265 - 2009-01-20