Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23141 - 23150 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23141 - 23150 of 29823 for des.
State v. Gerald A. Edson
of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions. State v. Bergeron, 162 Wis.2d 521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions. State v. Bergeron, 162 Wis.2d 521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation v. James Eisold
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farm v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10476 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farm v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Associated/F&M Bank v. Ray A. Johnson
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3864 - 2017-09-20
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3864 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Edward P. Barnes v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
de novo whether the sanction of dismissal was the appropriate remedy in this case. “A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19971 - 2017-09-21
de novo whether the sanction of dismissal was the appropriate remedy in this case. “A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutionality of statutes de novo, but they are presumed constitutional. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15
the constitutionality of statutes de novo, but they are presumed constitutional. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mary E. Schoate
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous but reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679069 - 2023-07-19
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous but reviews de novo whether those facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679069 - 2023-07-19
[PDF]
State v. Eyad H. Hammad
States Constitution, presents an issue that we review de novo.2 See City of Milwaukee v. Kilgore, 193
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9733 - 2017-09-19
States Constitution, presents an issue that we review de novo.2 See City of Milwaukee v. Kilgore, 193
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9733 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶9 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124595 - 2017-09-21
¶9 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 91
basis is likewise an error of law, and we review de novo ‘[w]hether the [c]ity followed the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119650 - 2014-10-14
basis is likewise an error of law, and we review de novo ‘[w]hether the [c]ity followed the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119650 - 2014-10-14